|
Since 2003, the Brazilian Government has shown a renewed commitment
to tackling the issue of forced labour, generally referred to as
slave labour in Brazil.
The Government has taken an active role in recognising the existence
of slavery and promoting discussion of the issue among the general
public, the media and within government departments. This included
an appeal from the President to all farm owners to co-operate with
the state and become allies in combating slavery 1;
a recognition at the UN Commission on Human Rights in 2004 that
slave labour continues to exist in Brazil; and a commitment by the
Government to eliminate slave labour by 2006. 2
The Government also set up the National Commission for the Eradication
of Slave Labour (CONATRAE), which is a permanent forum bringing
together different government departments, the federal police and
NGOs, to facilitate co-operation between these bodies and to discuss
practical solutions to the problem of slave labour. On 11 March
2003, President Lula da Silva launched the National Plan for the
Eradication of Slavery. The National Plan has many positive proposals,
including:
1. Improving the definition of slavery in Article 149 of the
penal code
On 12 December 2003, legislative amendments to the offence of reducing
someone to conditions analogous to slavery were approved, as proposed
in the National Plan. These amendments ensure that those responsible
for recruiting or transporting workers into slavery will now have
committed an offence under the modified law. Penalties for offenders
are also increased in certain circumstances (e.g. where the crime
is perpetrated against a minor). However, the introduction of generalised
terms, such as 'imposing an excessive working period' or 'degrading
conditions of work' into the definition of the offence may have
the unintended consequence of making it more difficult to obtain
heavier sentences for those who use slave labour. Furthermore, the
minimum penalty for this offence remains two years in prison. It
was expected that the minimum sentence would be increased to five
years in prison.
2. Expropriating property of those who use slavery
In February 2004, Brazil's Congress began to debate a Bill which
would allow the expropriation, without compensation, of land belonging
to those who maintain workers in conditions of slavery. If approved
and enforced this will provide a real sanction against those using
slave labour.
Furthermore, it has also been proposed that expropriated land will
then be used as part of the Government's agrarian reform programme
and thereby benefit the very people who have been exploited. 3
This is extremely important as statistics from the Department for
Labour Inspections show that up to 40 per cent of workers freed
from slave labour in the last eight years have been freed more than
once. 4 Providing access to land and an increased
public commitment to social and economic policies which focus on
local development and employment would prevent workers from falling
back into conditions of slave labour.
This law is currently under consideration. Similar proposals for
changes to the law to allow expropriation have been discussed in
Congress since 1995 and there is some concern that this initiative
may also become stalled.
3. Preventing those who use slave labour from accessing public
funds
A so called 'black list' has been developed of individuals and companies
who have used slave labour and who should therefore be prevented
from accessing public grants, credits or other financial supports.
The list has been set up and should be updated every six months.
However, there is some concern that there is no administration system
in place to ensure that individuals and companies that appear on
the list do have all public financial assistance withdrawn immediately
and are prevented from accessing new agricultural credits or other
benefits.
Increasing numbers of slave labourers have been freed
In the last three years the number of workers freed by the Special
Mobile Inspection Group has increased dramatically, rising from
583 in 2000, to 1,433 in 2001 and reaching 2,306 in 2002. In 2003,
a new record was reached when nearly 5,000 workers were freed, more
than double the number released in 2002. 5
These figures clearly show that the Special Mobile Inspection Group
has increased its effectiveness in recent years. This has been assisted
by the co-operation of several regional labour departments, which
have carried out approximately 20 per cent of all inspections.
The use of mobile courts to accompany the Special Mobile Inspection
Group has given the Special Group more authority in the regions
as the mobile courts can impose immediate fines, freeze bank accounts
and seize assets. This means that farm owners can no longer refuse
to co-operate and it is easier to get workers paid the money they
are owed.
The increase in the number of people being identified as working
in conditions of slave labour does not necessarily mean that the
use of slave labour is rising in Brazil. The increase in numbers
could also be attributed to more effective government intervention
against this problem, successful awareness raising campaigns and
greater confidence in the system leading more people to make complaints
to the authorities and to organisations like the Pastoral Land Commission
(CPT). However, the fact that some 5,000 individuals were identified
and released last year clearly shows that the problem has not diminished
and more will have to be done if the Government is to meet its target
of eliminating slave labour by 2006.
Providing appropriate resources
While the Special Group has released a record number of forced labourers
in the last three years, there are still concerns that its work
is being hampered by a lack of resources, intimidation and the high
level of impunity which continues to exists for those who use forced
labour.
CPT received 238 reports of slave labour in Brazil during 2003,
indicating that some 8,300 workers had been enslaved. Half of the
cases were reported in Para state. According to the CPT, the average
delay between a case being reported to the Special Group and the
inspection being carried out continues to be approximately one month.
However, in the first four months of 2004 these delays have increased
as a two month strike by the Federal Police has made it impossible
to carry out inspections. Delays in carrying out an inspection give
those using forced labour time to move workers, thereby seriously
undermining the chances of releasing the workers or securing prosecutions.
Consequently the number of workers rescued in the period from January
to April fell from 1,467 in 2003 (37 inspections) to some 400 in
2004 (15 inspections).
Securing more staff and appropriate transport (e.g. helicopters)
would facilitate faster reaction times and more visits to inaccessible
areas, such as the Iriri region. The Special Group should also have
adequate funds to cover witness expenses, including accommodation,
food and transport. These expenses are currently covered by CPT.
It is also vital that federal police officers accompany the Special
Group on its operations. This helps to ensure the security of the
labour inspectors, who may not be able to enter an estate without
police support, and should also facilitate charges being brought
against those using slave labour as labour inspectors cannot bring
criminal charges. The federal police may require additional resources
in order to participate in Special Group operations.
Increasing intimidation and violence
The increase in inspections has been accompanied by a rise in the
use of violence and intimidation against those working to stop slave
labour, especially in the states of Para and Tocantins. CPT members
from the Araguaina office in Tocantins state had to leave the area
after receiving repeated threats.
State officials have also been targeted. In October 2003, the labour
judge Dr Jorge Antônio Ramos Vieira had to leave Parauapebas
after receiving repeated death threats and on 11 February 2004,
his deputy was killed in a collision with a lorry while travelling
from Maraba to Parauapebas. In Tocantins state, the prosecutor Dr
Mario Lúcio de Avelar had to leave Palmas after receiving
threats. On 28 January 2004, three officials from the labour ministry
and their driver were murdered while carrying out investigations
of farms in Minas Gerais.
Clearly, all those working to combat slave labour must receive
adequate protection to allow them to carry out their work and those
using violence and intimidation must be prosecuted and face appropriate
penalties.
Ending impunity and imposing appropriate sanctions
The Special Group and mobile courts have been effective in releasing
individuals from slave labour conditions and negotiating the payment
of outstanding wages to workers. Successful claims for compensation
have also risen from 1.9 million Reais (US$654,270) in 2002 to 5.7
million Reais (US$1,962,810) in 2003. 6 However,
the continuing use of forced labour, as evidenced by the numbers
freed in 2003, indicates that the fines (paid directly to the state)
and criminal sanctions are not proving a sufficient deterrent.
This may be because many of the fines are not being paid. There
does not appear to be any publicly available figures regarding the
number of fines levied and paid. Fines below a certain amount are
often not followed up because it is considered to be too administratively
costly. Clearly where fines are not imposed, or are imposed but
not collected, then a situation of impunity exists and the abuses
are likely to continue.
In 2003, some 75 people were charged with the offence of putting
someone in a situation analogous to slavery. This is an important
step forward as prior to this very few people were indicted for
this crime. 7 However, concerns remain about
whether the existing legislation will deliver effective punishments
for those using slave labour.
Part of the problem is the continuing lack of clarity as to whether
cases analogous to slavery fall under local or federal jurisdiction.
While the question of responsibility remains unresolved cases can
get lost in the system or end up in local (i.e. state) jurisdiction
where individuals are more likely to be intimidated and/or co-opted
by powerful land owners.
Even if successfully prosecuted, the sentences handed down under
the existing system are unlikely to act as a deterrent. In Brazil,
if someone is convicted and sentenced to a prison term of less than
four years, this can then be converted into social services (e.g.
making food donations to the poor). Furthermore, first time offenders
who are sentenced to more than four years in prison can serve their
sentence under house arrest, which in practice allows them to live
at home.
It therefore does not appear that the penal sanctions provided
for by law are either adequate or strictly enforced and this appears
to be a major factor in explaining the continuing high incidence
of forced labour in Brazil.
Conclusions and recommendations
The Special Group has improved its effectiveness and identified
and released more than twice as many slave labourers in 2003 as
it did in 2002. The Government has made a clear commitment to tackle
slave labour, as outlined in the National Plan and its stated aim
of eliminating slave labour in Brazil by 2006. Despite these positive
steps, thousands of Brazilians continue to work in conditions of
forced labour. In view of the above, Anti-Slavery International
and CPT urge the Brazilian Government to prioritise action to:
- Provide the Special Group with the necessary material resources
(particularly personnel and transport) and institutional support
(especially support from the federal police and prosecutors during
raids) to allow it to carry out its work effectively.
- Give priority to implementing proposals which would:
(a) Bring slave labour offences clearly under federal jurisdiction
and give labour prosecutors the necessary competence to bring
criminal cases against persons who subject others to forced labour
practices.
(b) Expropriate properties from those who use slave labour and
use the land for agrarian reform.
(c) Ensure that individuals and enterprises using slave labour
are immediately prohibited from accessing all government financial
incentives. Existing credits or incentives should be immediately
withdrawn and/or repaid.
- Make information publicly available regarding the number of
prosecutions initiated, convictions secured and punishment given
for crimes relating to reducing someone to a condition analogous
to slavery. Also make available the number of fines imposed and
collected for the use of slave labour.
- Implement plans, particularly focusing on land reform and social
programmes, to prevent workers being entrapped in slave labour
situations in the most affected regions, such as Maranhao, Piauí,
Para and Tocantins.
1 Um apelo aos bons fazendeiros, Correio Braziliense,
10 February 2004
2 As part of this commitment the human rights minister, Nilmário
Miranda, announced that free hotlines will be introduced to report
human rights abuses, including slave labour. The hotlines will be
tested in Brasilia and, if successful, then extended to the rest of
the country. Vannildo Mendes and Luciana Vasconcelos, Agência
Brasil, 21 February 2004.
3 Stephen Temple, Brazilian Congress Debates Land Expropriation as
Punishment for Slave Labour, 12 February 2004, WMRC Daily Analysis.
4 De volta ao trabalho escravo, Correio Brasiliense, 1 February
2004.
5 While more than half those released in 2003 were in Para and Bahia,
the statistics also recorded slave labour in areas which previously
had not been documented (e.g. Rio de Janeiro).
6 Dobra número de pessoas tiradas da escravidão,
Geralda Doca, O Globo, 23 January 2004. In the case of the firm Lima
Araújo Ltda., which is still pending in the Marabá Labour
Court, labour prosecutors have demanded compensation equal to 40 per
cent of the total assets of the farm.
7 Information given by Dra Raquel Dodge, sub-procuradora federal dos
direitos do cidadãos at CONATRAE meeting, 22 March 2004.
|