Commissão Pastoral da Terra
Caixa Postal 749 CEP 74.001
224-4436 Goiania
Goias, Brazil
fax:+55 62 225 4967
email: cptnac@bbs.cultura.com.br
website: http://www.cptnac.com.br
 
United Nations Commission on Human Rights
Sub-Commission on the Promotion and Protection of Human Rights
Working Group on Contemporary Forms of Slavery
29th Session

Geneva 28 June - 2 July 2004


Forced labour in Brazil

Since 2003, the Brazilian Government has shown a renewed commitment to tackling the issue of forced labour, generally referred to as slave labour in Brazil.

The Government has taken an active role in recognising the existence of slavery and promoting discussion of the issue among the general public, the media and within government departments. This included an appeal from the President to all farm owners to co-operate with the state and become allies in combating slavery 1; a recognition at the UN Commission on Human Rights in 2004 that slave labour continues to exist in Brazil; and a commitment by the Government to eliminate slave labour by 2006. 2

The Government also set up the National Commission for the Eradication of Slave Labour (CONATRAE), which is a permanent forum bringing together different government departments, the federal police and NGOs, to facilitate co-operation between these bodies and to discuss practical solutions to the problem of slave labour. On 11 March 2003, President Lula da Silva launched the National Plan for the Eradication of Slavery. The National Plan has many positive proposals, including:

1. Improving the definition of slavery in Article 149 of the penal code
On 12 December 2003, legislative amendments to the offence of reducing someone to conditions analogous to slavery were approved, as proposed in the National Plan. These amendments ensure that those responsible for recruiting or transporting workers into slavery will now have committed an offence under the modified law. Penalties for offenders are also increased in certain circumstances (e.g. where the crime is perpetrated against a minor). However, the introduction of generalised terms, such as 'imposing an excessive working period' or 'degrading conditions of work' into the definition of the offence may have the unintended consequence of making it more difficult to obtain heavier sentences for those who use slave labour. Furthermore, the minimum penalty for this offence remains two years in prison. It was expected that the minimum sentence would be increased to five years in prison.

2. Expropriating property of those who use slavery
In February 2004, Brazil's Congress began to debate a Bill which would allow the expropriation, without compensation, of land belonging to those who maintain workers in conditions of slavery. If approved and enforced this will provide a real sanction against those using slave labour.

Furthermore, it has also been proposed that expropriated land will then be used as part of the Government's agrarian reform programme and thereby benefit the very people who have been exploited. 3 This is extremely important as statistics from the Department for Labour Inspections show that up to 40 per cent of workers freed from slave labour in the last eight years have been freed more than once. 4 Providing access to land and an increased public commitment to social and economic policies which focus on local development and employment would prevent workers from falling back into conditions of slave labour.

This law is currently under consideration. Similar proposals for changes to the law to allow expropriation have been discussed in Congress since 1995 and there is some concern that this initiative may also become stalled.

3. Preventing those who use slave labour from accessing public funds
A so called 'black list' has been developed of individuals and companies who have used slave labour and who should therefore be prevented from accessing public grants, credits or other financial supports. The list has been set up and should be updated every six months. However, there is some concern that there is no administration system in place to ensure that individuals and companies that appear on the list do have all public financial assistance withdrawn immediately and are prevented from accessing new agricultural credits or other benefits.

Increasing numbers of slave labourers have been freed
In the last three years the number of workers freed by the Special Mobile Inspection Group has increased dramatically, rising from 583 in 2000, to 1,433 in 2001 and reaching 2,306 in 2002. In 2003, a new record was reached when nearly 5,000 workers were freed, more than double the number released in 2002. 5

These figures clearly show that the Special Mobile Inspection Group has increased its effectiveness in recent years. This has been assisted by the co-operation of several regional labour departments, which have carried out approximately 20 per cent of all inspections.

The use of mobile courts to accompany the Special Mobile Inspection Group has given the Special Group more authority in the regions as the mobile courts can impose immediate fines, freeze bank accounts and seize assets. This means that farm owners can no longer refuse to co-operate and it is easier to get workers paid the money they are owed.

The increase in the number of people being identified as working in conditions of slave labour does not necessarily mean that the use of slave labour is rising in Brazil. The increase in numbers could also be attributed to more effective government intervention against this problem, successful awareness raising campaigns and greater confidence in the system leading more people to make complaints to the authorities and to organisations like the Pastoral Land Commission (CPT). However, the fact that some 5,000 individuals were identified and released last year clearly shows that the problem has not diminished and more will have to be done if the Government is to meet its target of eliminating slave labour by 2006.

Providing appropriate resources
While the Special Group has released a record number of forced labourers in the last three years, there are still concerns that its work is being hampered by a lack of resources, intimidation and the high level of impunity which continues to exists for those who use forced labour.

CPT received 238 reports of slave labour in Brazil during 2003, indicating that some 8,300 workers had been enslaved. Half of the cases were reported in Para state. According to the CPT, the average delay between a case being reported to the Special Group and the inspection being carried out continues to be approximately one month.

However, in the first four months of 2004 these delays have increased as a two month strike by the Federal Police has made it impossible to carry out inspections. Delays in carrying out an inspection give those using forced labour time to move workers, thereby seriously undermining the chances of releasing the workers or securing prosecutions. Consequently the number of workers rescued in the period from January to April fell from 1,467 in 2003 (37 inspections) to some 400 in 2004 (15 inspections).

Securing more staff and appropriate transport (e.g. helicopters) would facilitate faster reaction times and more visits to inaccessible areas, such as the Iriri region. The Special Group should also have adequate funds to cover witness expenses, including accommodation, food and transport. These expenses are currently covered by CPT.

It is also vital that federal police officers accompany the Special Group on its operations. This helps to ensure the security of the labour inspectors, who may not be able to enter an estate without police support, and should also facilitate charges being brought against those using slave labour as labour inspectors cannot bring criminal charges. The federal police may require additional resources in order to participate in Special Group operations.

Increasing intimidation and violence
The increase in inspections has been accompanied by a rise in the use of violence and intimidation against those working to stop slave labour, especially in the states of Para and Tocantins. CPT members from the Araguaina office in Tocantins state had to leave the area after receiving repeated threats.

State officials have also been targeted. In October 2003, the labour judge Dr Jorge Antônio Ramos Vieira had to leave Parauapebas after receiving repeated death threats and on 11 February 2004, his deputy was killed in a collision with a lorry while travelling from Maraba to Parauapebas. In Tocantins state, the prosecutor Dr Mario Lúcio de Avelar had to leave Palmas after receiving threats. On 28 January 2004, three officials from the labour ministry and their driver were murdered while carrying out investigations of farms in Minas Gerais.

Clearly, all those working to combat slave labour must receive adequate protection to allow them to carry out their work and those using violence and intimidation must be prosecuted and face appropriate penalties.

Ending impunity and imposing appropriate sanctions
The Special Group and mobile courts have been effective in releasing individuals from slave labour conditions and negotiating the payment of outstanding wages to workers. Successful claims for compensation have also risen from 1.9 million Reais (US$654,270) in 2002 to 5.7 million Reais (US$1,962,810) in 2003. 6 However, the continuing use of forced labour, as evidenced by the numbers freed in 2003, indicates that the fines (paid directly to the state) and criminal sanctions are not proving a sufficient deterrent.

This may be because many of the fines are not being paid. There does not appear to be any publicly available figures regarding the number of fines levied and paid. Fines below a certain amount are often not followed up because it is considered to be too administratively costly. Clearly where fines are not imposed, or are imposed but not collected, then a situation of impunity exists and the abuses are likely to continue.

In 2003, some 75 people were charged with the offence of putting someone in a situation analogous to slavery. This is an important step forward as prior to this very few people were indicted for this crime. 7 However, concerns remain about whether the existing legislation will deliver effective punishments for those using slave labour.

Part of the problem is the continuing lack of clarity as to whether cases analogous to slavery fall under local or federal jurisdiction. While the question of responsibility remains unresolved cases can get lost in the system or end up in local (i.e. state) jurisdiction where individuals are more likely to be intimidated and/or co-opted by powerful land owners.

Even if successfully prosecuted, the sentences handed down under the existing system are unlikely to act as a deterrent. In Brazil, if someone is convicted and sentenced to a prison term of less than four years, this can then be converted into social services (e.g. making food donations to the poor). Furthermore, first time offenders who are sentenced to more than four years in prison can serve their sentence under house arrest, which in practice allows them to live at home.

It therefore does not appear that the penal sanctions provided for by law are either adequate or strictly enforced and this appears to be a major factor in explaining the continuing high incidence of forced labour in Brazil.

Conclusions and recommendations
The Special Group has improved its effectiveness and identified and released more than twice as many slave labourers in 2003 as it did in 2002. The Government has made a clear commitment to tackle slave labour, as outlined in the National Plan and its stated aim of eliminating slave labour in Brazil by 2006. Despite these positive steps, thousands of Brazilians continue to work in conditions of forced labour. In view of the above, Anti-Slavery International and CPT urge the Brazilian Government to prioritise action to:

  1. Provide the Special Group with the necessary material resources (particularly personnel and transport) and institutional support (especially support from the federal police and prosecutors during raids) to allow it to carry out its work effectively.

  2. Give priority to implementing proposals which would:
    (a) Bring slave labour offences clearly under federal jurisdiction and give labour prosecutors the necessary competence to bring criminal cases against persons who subject others to forced labour practices.
    (b) Expropriate properties from those who use slave labour and use the land for agrarian reform.
    (c) Ensure that individuals and enterprises using slave labour are immediately prohibited from accessing all government financial incentives. Existing credits or incentives should be immediately withdrawn and/or repaid.

  3. Make information publicly available regarding the number of prosecutions initiated, convictions secured and punishment given for crimes relating to reducing someone to a condition analogous to slavery. Also make available the number of fines imposed and collected for the use of slave labour.

  4. Implement plans, particularly focusing on land reform and social programmes, to prevent workers being entrapped in slave labour situations in the most affected regions, such as Maranhao, Piauí, Para and Tocantins.


1 Um apelo aos bons fazendeiros, Correio Braziliense, 10 February 2004
2 As part of this commitment the human rights minister, Nilmário Miranda, announced that free hotlines will be introduced to report human rights abuses, including slave labour. The hotlines will be tested in Brasilia and, if successful, then extended to the rest of the country. Vannildo Mendes and Luciana Vasconcelos, Agência Brasil, 21 February 2004.
3 Stephen Temple, Brazilian Congress Debates Land Expropriation as Punishment for Slave Labour, 12 February 2004, WMRC Daily Analysis.
4 De volta ao trabalho escravo, Correio Brasiliense, 1 February 2004.
5 While more than half those released in 2003 were in Para and Bahia, the statistics also recorded slave labour in areas which previously had not been documented (e.g. Rio de Janeiro).
6 Dobra número de pessoas tiradas da escravidão, Geralda Doca, O Globo, 23 January 2004. In the case of the firm Lima Araújo Ltda., which is still pending in the Marabá Labour Court, labour prosecutors have demanded compensation equal to 40 per cent of the total assets of the farm.
7 Information given by Dra Raquel Dodge, sub-procuradora federal dos direitos do cidadãos at CONATRAE meeting, 22 March 2004.